Two thoughts on the Bush speech. One by me, and one by ADG:

.: One reason for destroying Saddam Hussein is apparently because of his link to the terrorists. Wouldn’t it be more effective to actually go after the implementors (the terrorists)? To me, this seems like fighting a forest fire by cutting down all of the healthy trees, without actually attacking the fire itself.
.: The fact that Iraq has had 12 years to disarm is actually not a good argument for going in. If we’ve given them 12 years, why do we no feel a need to go to war if they don’t comply in a few days?